Re: Re: MD Patterns

From: Steve Peterson (peterson.steve@verizon.net)
Date: Fri May 14 2004 - 14:15:41 BST

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "RE: MD Morality of deadly force"

    Hi Mark,

    I have been busy, too. I will be sure to give our discussion more thought and
    respond to your thoughts, but I don't know how soon.

    Steve

    >
    > From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
    > Date: 2004/05/14 Fri AM 06:41:17 CDT
    > To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    > Subject: Re: MD Patterns
    >
    > In a message dated 5/6/04 9:27:43 PM GMT Daylight Time,
    > peterson.steve@verizon.net writes:
    >
    >
    > > Patterns can have far weaker correlations with substance than a river
    > > does. We can think of gravity as a pattern though gravity has
    > > virtually no properties associated with substance.
    >
    > Hello Steve,
    > I have been busy but have kept your post in mind.
    > One must understand that the key feature of substance is that it is
    > permanent. This permanence only appears to change because there are changes
    in its
    > attributes or modes, (spatio-temperal, form, colour, etc.)
    > It is possible to appeal to an ultimate substance - God - of which everything
    > is a mode or attribute? So, you can see how the debate is really one of
    > permanence and change?
    > The MoQ avoids many of the problems of substance because DQ is a flux, and
    > patterns are stable only for as long as they may be sustained. Everything is
    > evolving or swirling and going nowhere? But even swirls and eddies must be
    > sustained in their dead-end activities by DQ? This is where i would disagree
    with
    > Platt, who suggests some static patterns do not involve DQ.
    > To move onto the notion of coherence, we may describe very static patterns as
    > being a particular variety of low coherence. These patterns hover at a sweet
    > spot of their own so removed from High coherence as to appear almost dead?
    >
    > To sum up, Substantiality has for its basis the concept of permanence. But
    > there are no permanent structures in the MoQ.
    >
    > All the best,
    > Mark
    >
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 14 2004 - 14:17:52 BST