Re: MD Quality evil destruction contingency

From: David Morey (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Sat May 15 2004 - 22:01:09 BST

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD quality religion (Christianity)"

    Hi Dave

    Sounds about right to me.
    I see contingency as happening when patterns crash into each
    other in space-time and damage each other's operation.
    If the sun explodes that is its normal development of the pattern
    'sun' It is contingent bad luck for the surrounding planets and their
    patterns. Also the human body is a complex of patterns, and
    it has to cope with all the patterns working within and around it to
    continue its own existence as long as possible. Somtimes it
    fails to cope, such as when it hits a car pattern heading off to work
    in another complex pattern. We call this bad because we know we
    should value people living patterns more than people driving quickly
    to work patterns. Evil perhaps involves the conscious application
    of lower values to supersede higher values, like dumbing down TV.

    regards
    David M

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "storeyd" <storeyd@bc.edu>
    To: "David Morey" <us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk>; <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2004 8:29 PM
    Subject: RE: MD Quality evil destruction contingency

    > Evil is the result of an unnecessary suppression of DQ in order to
    preserve a
    > pattern of SQ that has failed to serve its evolutionary purpose. i think
    its
    > important to recognize that the MOQ is not a Manicheanism, the MOQ
    universe is
    > not a battleground between two diametrical forces...it is
    > assymetrical...though DQ may be informing and possibilizing all things,
    all
    > things are not good, and evil/violence is NOT a necessary, integral part
    of
    > the process. Now "Evil" understood as a religious category is when a SQ
    > pattern (say, a religious faith) ascribes ontological status to a negation
    of
    > DQ...that is, it takes shadows for the light that casts them...this
    fixated
    > concept of Evil is, in fact, a suppression of DQ itself, because it calls
    evil
    > a static, eternal, unchanging entity (say, the devil). thus, all evil is
    > contingent, because all concepts are limited and contingent...this doesn't
    > mean that evil's not "real", merely that it is phase-specific, an
    appropriate
    > criterion of judgment for a certain type of SQ.
    >
    > patterns and contingency? i would briefly say that the more stable and
    > ingrained the pattern, in space-time, then the less contingent it is...for
    > example, the intellectual level is exteremly dependent on and contingent
    with
    > respect to the biological level, and even more so to the inorganic level.
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 15 2004 - 22:12:17 BST