RE: MD "biological" crime

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Mon May 24 2004 - 15:04:23 BST

  • Next message: Mark Steven Heyman: "Re: MD quality religion (Christianity)"

    Hi MSH:

    > msh says:
    > CNN? They were among the biggest cheerleaders for the war in Iraq,
    > only slightly less enthusiastic than Fox News.

    Among us conservatives CNN is affectionately known as the Communist News
    Network.

    > Commercial media, I'm afraid, is useless for any kind of
    > serious analysis of events.

    On this we agree. The latest Pew Survey, published yesterday, found that
    liberals make a disproportionate share of newsroom workers in print, TV and
    radio. 34% identified themselves as liberal compared to 7% conservative. As
    for non-commercial media being a more reliable source, we've seen how
    outrageously the news was distorted by the BBC.

    > As for Saddam, as I mentioned in detail earlier, there were people in
    > Iraq trying to remove him from power and begin democratization a
    > decade prior to the war. If these folks had been given even a little
    > help from the US, such as stopping the murderous sanctions against
    > Iraqi citizens, they may very well have succeeded.

    Didn't the U.N. impose the sanctions? Didn't the U.N. also create a food for
    oil program which is now being investigated because of suspected corruption
    by U.N. officials? Any other suggestions as to how the U.S. might have
    "helped" the Iraq people stage a successful revolution against Saddam? (Make
    me wonder if Castro's Cuba is your model for destroying a corrupt society
    from within.)

    > No, the object
    > wasn't removing Saddam, the object was, and continues to be, to
    > occupy Iraq.

    The object is to establish a democracy in the Middle East to blunt radical
    Islam's quest for the world domination, and to demonstrate that terrorism
    doesn't pay, at least as far as the U.S. and Britain are concerned (unlike
    Spain who capitulated to terrorism in a heartbeat.)

    I think Pirsig would say the Iraq war is a moral war for similar reasons he
    gives for saying the Civil War was a moral war. Intellectual values of
    freedom take precedence over totalitarian social values. Do you think it's
    better (more moral) that the Iraq people live in a Western style democracy
    than under Saddam's or Bin Laden's rule?

    Best,
    Platt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 24 2004 - 15:04:10 BST