From: Adam Watt (adamwatt@mac.com)
Date: Thu Jun 03 2004 - 16:18:34 BST
>>
>> On Sunday, May 23, 2004, at 07:05 pm, Platt Holden wrote:
>>
>>> MSH asks:
>>>
>>>> The question remains: Why is killing 3000 civilians in NYC an act
>>>> of terror, while killing 10000 civilians in Iraq is not? Try to
>>>> answer, without calling Rush Limbaugh please.
>>>
>>> I agree with you and your fellow travelers at CNN and NPR that we
>>> should put
>>> Saddam back in power so he can resume slaughtering hundreds of
>>> thousands of
>>> his own people not to mention killing thousands of Kuwaites.
>>>
>>> Platt
>>
>> AW writes -
>> Hello - It says.. TRY TO ANSWER PLEASE. You didn't. Again. Also,
>> people are not germs, not in the MOQ, or anywhere bar perhaps rabid
>> right-wing rhetoric...
>
> The question still remains.. maybe if you read Chomsky you'll be able
> to answer, Platt. Doesn't look as if you are now..
>>
..Infact, your looking quite incapable of a response, for the third
time of asking.. Ironic that you mention 'weakness of arguments' in
your previous
post :
Platt 'But, be not intimidated, as I'm sure you're not. It's simply a
sign of the
weakness of their arguments.'
..when infact whenever you are confronted with a point you cannot
answer, you simply ignore it. Pretty damn weak I'd say. As far as I can
see your criticising someone you haven't even read, and therefore have
absolutely NO IDEA what you are talking about. Which makes you a narrow
minded old man whos opinions are about as credible as the WMD claims
your beloved neo-conservative administration used to manipulate your
populace in to justifying an otherwise untenable invasion. Yourself,
and Robert.M, so it seems. are content to make totally unfounded
allegations against Chomsky.. I ask you AGAIN - what have you read of
his? I suspect nothing. Correct me if I'm wrong. Either way, if you
wish to refute anything he's said, you need to quote whatever that may
be in context, and then state what you refutation is. Otherwise, sorry,
but you just come across as a rambling fool. You've avoided the above
question, the 'critics' of Chomsky you cited were of no significance..
etc etc etc..
regards,
>>
>> Adam
>>>
>>>
>>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 03 2004 - 16:23:19 BST