Re: MD Noam Chomsky

From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Sun Jun 06 2004 - 23:20:47 BST

  • Next message: Exxon Valdez: "Re: MD Ronald Reagan"

    Hi all,

    For those of you who believe that NC sees some sort of "moral
    equivalence" between the US/UK and the Nazis, here's a response from
    today's batch of emails. The questioner was "dismayed" to hear that
    NC thought the US should have gotten involved in the European
    conflict sooner, since the questioner sees no difference between
    Nazism and the US-UK system .

    Best to all,
    msh

    Reply from NC,

    I still stand by those feelings.  Just for the record, the
    first article I remember writing was in a school newspaper
    in February 1939, after the fall of Barcelona, expressing
    dismay and fear about the expansion of the fascist plague
    over Europe.  I still feel the same way.  It has little if
    anything to do with `"really" defending democracy and
    freedom.'  Even at age 10 I was skeptical enough about
    that.  But I strongly disagreed then, and still do, with
    the rather favorable attitudes of the US and British
    governments towards Hitler, and think it would have been
    critically important to stop him much earlier -- as could
    have been done without war, though possibly not by 1939. 
    Recall that after Munich, Roosevelt's chief adviser, Sumner
    Welles, was hailing the prospects for peace with a benign
    Germany playing a crucial role, and Mussolini was always
    greatly admired, across a very wide spectrum.  That was
    very frightening in the 1930s, from a child's perspective. 
    And is so even more from an adult perspective, supported by
    a lot of evidence not available then.

    You ask what differentiates US intervention then from US
    intervention today.  One crucial difference is that there
    was no intervention then.  Contrary to current propaganda,
    the US did not intervene in the European or Asian wars,
    except indirectly (by supplying Britain, etc.).  The
    country was neutralist, until attacked.  That's not
    intervention.

    I'm sorry that you don't see the difference between Nazism
    and the US-UK system.  It's very real.  Luckily for India,
    it was never conquered by the Nazis.  The British were bad
    enough, but the Nazis were incomparably worse.  And not
    just a matter of gas chambers.  Putting them aside, what
    about the plans to exterminate 10s of millions of Slavs so
    as to create Lebensraum for the master race -- just for
    starters?

    I'd really suggest that you rethink all of this.  All evils
    are not identical.

    Noam Chomsky

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 06 2004 - 23:18:17 BST