RE: MD Mussolini: Splendid chap.

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sun Jun 13 2004 - 20:23:34 BST

  • Next message: Paul Turner: "RE: MD Objectivism and the MOQ"

    Howdy MOQers:

    From Platt Holden:
    I have to hand it to DMB and MSH. Their attempts to revise history seem
    convincing, particularly their descriptions of "fascism." What they fail
    to tell you, however, is that Mussolini was a socialist, who, thrown out
    by fellow-socialists, formed his own socialist party named "fascist" after
    a symbol from ancient Rome. Hitler's outfit was called the National
    Socialist German Workers' Party, with a manifesto copied from Marx. It was
    Stalin who named Hitler's regime "fascist' to cover up the fact that it,
    too, was socialist like his own bloody regime.

    dmb replies:
    By that logic both the Union of Soviet Socialist REPUBLICS and the People's
    REPUBLIC of China were/are the same as the Republican Party. There is often
    huge gap between labels and the actual content. Besides, its a matter of
    historical fact that Hitler was rabidly anti-communist and hated liberals
    even more so. Once again, Platt has demonstrated that he is not in possesion
    of the facts and wouldn't be capable of interpreting those facts even if he
    had them. But this is only to be expected from those who are informed by Ayn
    Rand and Rush Limbaugh.
     
    Platt said;
    No question in my mind, nor in Pirsig's, which system is more moral.

    dmb says:
    "A man with no doubt is a monster." Garrison Keillor 6/12/04 (He was
    refering to Bush, but applies more widely than than.)

    Despite the fact that I posted a Pirsig quote that directly contradicts
    Platt's assertion, first in February of 2002 and probably a dozen times
    since then, he persists in making this conspicuously incorrect point.

    "It's not that Victorian social economic patterns are more moral than
    socialist intellectual economic patterns. Quite the opposite. They are LESS
    moral as static patterns go." P221

    And they are LESS moral because they are at a lower level of evolution, as
    in the distinction between socialism and fascism...

    "The hurricane of social forces released by the overthrow of society by
    intellect was most strongly felt in Europe, ..where Communism and socialism,
    programs for intellectual control over society, were confronted by the
    reactionary forces of fascism, a program for the social control of
    intellect." P274

    Further, it is crystal clear that Pirsig defines socialism as intellectual
    and fascism as social and yet Platt continues to insist they are not only on
    the same level, but are in fact the same thing. Pirsig does not stop with
    ideological designations. He goes on to be very specific in his description
    of fascism and socialism as a conflict between levels by using concrete
    historical examples...

    "The gigantic power of socialism and fascism, which have overwhelmed this
    century, is explained by a conflict of levels of evolution. This conflict
    explains the driving force behind Hitler not as an insane search for power
    but as an all-consuming glorification of social authority and hatred of
    intellectualism. His anti-Semitism was fueled by anti-intellectualism. His
    hatred of communists was fueled by anti-intellectualism. His exaltation of
    the German volk was fueled by it. His fanatic persecution of any kind of
    intellectual freedom was driven by it."

    Ken Wilber essentially makes the same distinction in his INTEGRAL
    PSYCHOLOGY...

    "Tribalism, when left to its own devices, is relatively benign, simply
    becasue its means and its technologies are relatively harmless. You can only
    inflict so much damage on the biosphere, and on other humans, with a bow and
    arrow. The problem is that the advanced technologies of rationality, when
    hijacked by tribalism and its ethnocentric drives, can be devastating.
    Auschwitz is not the result of rationality. Auschwitz is the result of the
    many products of rationality being used in irrational ways. Auschwitz is
    rationality hijacked by tribalism, by an ethnocentric mythology of blood and
    soil and race, rooted in the land, romantic in its dispositions, barbaric in
    its ethnic cleansing. You cannot seriously attempt genocide with a bow and
    arrow; but you can attempt it with steel and coal, combustion engines and
    gas chambers, machine guns and atomic bombs. These are not rational desires
    by any definition of rational; these are ethnocentric tribalism
    commandeering the tools of an advanced consciousness and using them
    presicelyt for the lowest of the lowest motives. Auschwitz is the endgame,
    not of reason, but of tribalim."

    So you can see that both Pirsig and Wilber define fascism as a reactionary
    movement that opposes rationality and intellectualism. Both describe it as a
    regression back to a pre-modern, mythic way of thinking.

    I think we can see the same impulse in Christian fundamentalism, which we
    can rightly call Christo-fascism. Consider the 66% of Americans who take the
    book of Revelations literally. In the scenario depicted there, all the
    people in the world who are not Christians will either be converted or
    killed and sent to hell forever. This is a kind of divine genocide, an
    infantile fantasy that all dissenteres will be eliminated and cleansed from
    the earth. Hitler, at least, was willing to take responsiblity for his
    genocidal impulses. Or consider the administrations stated goal of ridding
    the world of "evildoers". Notice also the anti-intellectual impulse in both
    kinds of conservatives. This is extremely dangerous stuff, my friends.
    Beyond the murderous effects of such reactionary movements, there is also
    the risk of destroying the intellectual level itself. This is what is under
    attack by these various reactionary movements. And this is what is under
    attack from Platt. He never met an intellectual or a liberal for whom he did
    not have utter contempt. And neither did Hitler, who, like Platt, also liked
    to paint. (Now I'm just having fun.)

    Thanks,
    dmb

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 13 2004 - 20:28:21 BST