From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Wed Jun 23 2004 - 12:52:09 BST
Dear Mark H and Johnny,
I apologise for changing the thread title. That was naughty.
The one i was responding to had peanut butter in the title and didn't reflect
what i wanted to concentrate on, which was Platt Holden's latest attempt to
shoe horn the MOQ into Randian Objectivism.
I would have thought that after a decade of contributing to the MOQ.org Platt
would be able to distinguish clearly between SOM and the MOQ. Apparently not.
I have come to the conclusion that it takes an enormous effort and an
expenditure of great energy to remain in the dark.
All the best,
Mark M
Hi Johnny and Mark-M,
You guys cross-posted to different threads, responding to the same
subject re the MOQ and free enterprise/markets. On first reading, I
think both of you are saying the same thing in slightly different
ways, and I think both of you are right.
I want to to sleep on it, then try to develop some "coherence"
between both posts, and get back to you in this thread.
Thanks to both of you for your thoughts.
Best,
Mark Steven Heyman (msh)
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 23 2004 - 13:31:40 BST