Re: MD quality religion (cosmotheism)

From: Wim Nusselder (wim.nusselder@antenna.nl)
Date: Mon Jun 28 2004 - 07:33:07 BST

  • Next message: gav: "Re: MD immoral irony?????"

    Dear Paul V.,

    Thanks for your off-list explanation of pantheism and panentheism of 23 Jun
    2004 17:40:15 +0000. It confirms that my beliefs are (recognizable as)
    panentheism rather than as Christian. I just wouldn't deny that it can also
    be Meaningful to depict God as person. I will return to that in a separate
    post.

    You wrote 22 Jun 2004 17:21:53 +0000:
    'If that [my openness to DQ] is true, then we do have far more in common
    than you might think. :D'

    Or more than YOU suggest in the way you write (labeling people)...?!
    What does ":D" mean? Does it detract (in this and other cases) from the
    content of what you write before?

    You continued:
    'The "practice" of Cosmotheism can be quite individualistic and
    non-dogmatic.'

    Fine. So is that of Quakers. How are cosmotheists organized? What are the
    practical results deriving from their beliefs? How do they act differently
    than non-cosmotheists? To what extent have (some) cosmotheists attained
    'godhood' (more than non-cosmotheists could?) and how can I see that they
    did?

    Please explain in your own words. I prefer not to read texts by others you
    refer me to. That would cost me too much time.

    With friendly greetings,

    Wim

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jun 28 2004 - 08:34:10 BST