From: ant.mcwatt@ntlworld.com
Date: Sun Jul 04 2004 - 15:58:46 BST
Slight correction from previous post. In the last paragraph, read "elements" rather than "ideas" i.e.
Ant McWatt comments:
I perceive the MOQ as an improvement and development from previously established ideas and, as far as socialism and capitalism are concerned, the MOQ attempts to combine the best elements from both systems. As mentioned before, this is why I find it (as Pirsig eventually did with James’ idea of uniting science and religion) more beneficial to move on from holding onto either one of these previous systems (though I’d still give Thatcher an un-Buddhist V-sign if I saw her out on the road and Bill Clinton a handshake) and proceeding towards an MOQ orientated perspective.
Now isn’t that a more interesting challenge?
Best wishes,
Anthony.
-----------------------------------------
Email provided by http://www.ntlhome.com/
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jul 04 2004 - 16:03:02 BST