From: David Morey (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Thu Jul 08 2004 - 20:26:14 BST
Hi
I guess porn has low art quality
but relies on whatever biological quality
is prepared to undress.
regards
David M
----- Original Message -----
From: MBSJ79@aol.com
To: moq_discuss@moq.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 11:09 PM
Subject: Fwd: MD (no subject)
To Matt:
I was talking about what the MoQ has to say about porn, for example, what kind of quality it has/lacks. I wasn't really talking about sex, but if that's where you're leaning i guess that's ok. I meant more along the lines of LILA, and how Phaedrus comes to the conclusion that she has biological, but not social, Quality.
calvin
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 08 2004 - 23:52:28 BST