RE: MD the metaphysics of free-enterprise

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Thu Jul 15 2004 - 11:46:58 BST

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD the metaphysics of free-enterprise"

    Arlo,

    > Well, this is a little reductionistic. I could easily say "Freedom" =
    > "education", and support this by saying that "slaves were not allowed to
    > attend school". Right?

    You could say it but you wouldn't be right, unless you believe education
    is a human right.
     
    > I thought I made the positive role of money clear when I mentioned buying a
    > Harley? Here I think you are confusing social wealth and personal wealth.

    Social wealth? Where did that idea come from? Does it mean that part of
    everything you earn and own belongs to others? Are "free roads" and "free
    college educations" human rights?

    > So, if my neighbors next door lose their heating for the winter
    > (hypothetically), it is "not good" for me to let them stay with me? Or help
    > them with the money to pay for the heating?
    >
    > If the little girl across the street, whose family is unemployed, is not
    > eating well, it is "not good" for me to offer them help buying food?

    If it makes you feel good to help others, fine. What I object to is
    someone pointing a gun to my head and telling me I must or else. On
    balance, welfare has done more harm than good by creating an entire class
    of dependent people whose motive to become self-sufficient has been
    squelched.

    > > I find nothing wrong with economic "inequities." As Jon wrote not long
    > > ago, "Communism appealed to people for all the wrong reason -- it offered
    > > a world where everyone would be equally miserable."
    > >
    >
    > "Inequities" existing can not be used for justification that severe
    > inequity can or should be tolerated. People will likely always commit
    > murder, but that does not mean we should blindly accept murders and "live
    > and let live".

    What's your point? Is there such a thing as non-severe murder?
     
    > Are you advancing the notion that if UC went out of business because it had
    > to abide by "stifling social codes", that people everywhere would be worse
    > off, would not be able to find new or better employment, and would thus
    > cease being "free"?

    If Union Carbide when out of business prices for a lot of goods would
    skyrocket, making a lot of people worse off.

    > The regulations against monopolies are regulations promoting a "level
    > playing field". Would you abolish them?
     
    I would abolish laws that give government a monopoly of doing anything
    except run the the military, the police, and the courts . . .especially
    its monopoly on public education which is, on balance, an unmitigated
    disaster.

    > A little reductionistic again. What you are basically stating is that since
    > "free" people can "earn money", that maximizing personal wealth maximizes
    > personal freedom. Furthermore, that we should only be concerned with our
    > own "freedom", and if that "freedom" (maximizing wealth) tramples someone
    > else, then that is their tough luck.

    I don't accept your premise that maximizing wealth necessarily "tramples"
    anyone. That's a reflection of belief that there's only such much of the
    pie to go around. What capitalism does is create an ever larger pie.

    > So, you can either work as a slave and earn no money, or as a a free person
    > and earn money. I agree that the latter option is damn "Good". But you can
    > also work as a free person and earn money and believe that your ability to
    > maximize your individual money stockpile is the only "Good" that exists, OR
    > you can work as a free person and earn money and recognize that there are
    > greater freedoms, or greater measures of freedom, than simply the gross
    > total on your personal paycheck or sum in your personal savings account. I
    > think the latter is damn "Good"!

    Believe what you wish. Speak out against what you deem evil. You're free
    to do so unless intimidated by political correctness designed to smother
    "degenerate" views.

    Maybe we can agree that freedom of speech is the most precious freedom of
    all, one that's worth dying for.

    Platt

     

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 15 2004 - 11:46:26 BST