From: Paul Turner (paul@turnerbc.co.uk)
Date: Tue Jul 27 2004 - 11:07:50 BST
Hi Platt
Platt said:
Fame and fortune are social level values. An individual can
intellectually choose biological values, social values or intellectual
values to pursue. His intentions are often intellectual, that is, he can
rationalize his behavior, like gamblers and criminals do. But it's his
behavior that determines what value level applies.
Paul:
This, Platt, is exactly what I'm saying - it is "behaviour that
determines what value level applies." By grouping the other levels
together into "an individual" and placing "the individual" at the top
level, all "individual" behaviour would occur at the top level, and by
virtue of that, would be superior to all other levels by default.
I really think the MOQ defends the individual in terms of the ability to
respond to Dynamic Quality, which can *improve* patterns at *any level*
- and it is within the domain of the static levels to make sure that the
whole structure is not undermined by this Dynamic activity.
Cheers
Paul
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 27 2004 - 12:16:59 BST