Re: MD Genes, Memes, Darwin and Lamarck

From: 3rdWavedave (dlt44@ipa.net)
Date: Tue Oct 17 2000 - 00:11:59 BST


Kenneth Jonathan all

This jumped out at me,

K
> > One said, choise [sic] and free will are necessary to human memetic evolution,
> otherwise there could be no directed modifacation of l- memes and there
> could be no selection between alternative versions created by such modi-
> fications (g- memes).

3WD
My recent focus on the work of William James leads me to comment that
his definition of "free" will is limited to a choice, between
alternatives, which if made now can be reasonably expected to be
experienced in the future as the "wished for" results. But he
emphasizes that in many cases " no decision" or "no choice" is a choice.
 In the spreading or replication of value patterns or memes my guess is
that this is the most common or prevalent case.

A good deal of what you talk about in the rest of the 2:46 pm split
could be tied to what James discussed as "habit" in his early work.

3WD

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:00:48 BST