Hello everyone
>From: RISKYBIZ9@aol.com
>Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
>To: moq_discuss@moq.org
>Subject: Re: MD Self, Free/Determinism : a short essay (again... ;)
>Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 21:07:51 EDT
>
>Similar but different?
>
>I have devolved into lurker mode for the past few months, but am tempted to
>jump in briefly.
>
>My take on the free will vs determinism issue, as well as the DQ vs sq
>interpretations of art, music and intellectual knowledge is simply that
>they
>are all by-products of the division process itself. All the divisions are
>practical yet none are essential or INHERENT in reality. Without the
>division, the entire free will issue begins to dissolve away, as what is
>there to be free from? Similarly, the artistic development isn't one of
>reaction to a song, it is growth and development of something that is only
>later divisible (inadequately) into component parts. The growth process
>itself is what the story of the song relates to.
>
>We don't experience DQ. DQ is experience, including that experience of
>deriving and dividing this experience into that which is interpreted as the
>self, or the voluntary self, or the song.
>
>Similar, but different.....
Hi Roger
Yes, similar but different...but I fail to find references in Lila that
support your thesis pertaining to Dynamic Quality being experience. If you
have time, could you provide a few pertinent quotes to chew on so we can see
how they taste?
Thanks
Dan
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:27 BST