Rog,
You wrote:
>But anyways, what was your point?
Sorry if my point got lost in all the words, but I'll try once more.
My MoQ hypothesis:
A well-developed society can accept many guiding intellectual ideas, in
other words a guiding intellectual level. In my opinion the western society
is such a well-developed society. Terrorist attacks, like the one America
experienced one week ago will reduce the number of intellectual ideas that a
society will accept (or have interest in).
Many societies, probably including Afghanistan, are at a low level of
development, maybe only nursing the intellectual idea of their religion and
their hate for the western world.
A massive attack on such a society will probably leave the society in a
even worse condition, clinging even more to their narrow intellectual
ideas.
So how do we get rid of the terrorists according to my MoQ hypothesis?
IMO we need to help them build a society that can develop an
intellectual pattern of value, including preferable intellectual ideas
that do not cause war, terrorism and murder.
I have based this thinking on my understanding of the MoQ, and the
example of the electro-shock treatment of the mental patient needing to
build new patterns after the treatment.
Rog wrote 10 June 2001:
>As a Libertarian I believe that individuals have certain rights which are
not
>subject to interference in any form by the state.
Rog wrote 18 Sept 2001:
>I am not a libertarian
Ok with me, I just get a little confused, but I like your development.
Gerhard
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:30 BST