does DQ being pre-intellectual mean that all our experience is
post-intellectual?
i am not sure about that rick. what of undivided experience?
non-intellectually mediated experience.
like dancing, motorbike riding, sport etc .
if we refer to undivided experience as post- intellectual aren't we tying
ourselves some semantic knots?
>
> KEITH:
> > the concept 'sound' by defn is intellectual
> > sound or noise is something many sentient entities experience in the
> absence
> > of intellect (including us; music for instance)
>
> RICK:
> I see where you're confused...
> The 'intellectual' of the pre-intellectual/post-intellectual split is
> different than 'Intellectual' as used to refer those static patterns that
> trump biology. You've got it right when you say 'sound or noise is
> something many sentient entities experience'.
> Now take the next step... "DQ is the pre-intellectual cutting edge of
> experience (LILA p133)." That is, all 'experience' is always in the wake
> DQ. 'Experience' and all its derivatives (like sound, noise, light etc)
are
> ALWAYS post-intellectual.
>
> Understanding this relationship of DQ and experience is the key to
> unraveling the MOQ.
>
> rick
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:47 BST