>===== Original Message From moq_discuss@moq.org =====
GLENN: The interesting thing about the eye drops is that it produces the same
visual effect as the D. light, except that ALL objects in the visual field
have
the fuzzy glow (Erin, I don't know why you think 'glow' isn't suggestive of
the D. light).
ERIN: Because I think you trying to compare dharmakaya to what it is like with
eyedrops is not the way to go in understanding what he is saying. It is not
that the whole object was glowing. (pg 390) The tiger's face caught Phaedrus's
attention and then he saw the eyes had blazed what seemed to be an inner
light. The glowing that Phaedrus is describing and the glowing you are
describing are entirely two different mental pictures. You were wondering why
it was always with animates, well if the illumination is within the eyes there
is your answer. Now compare this illumination with your couch being fuzzy
when you are eyedrops and you will understand why I don't like the way you
used glow.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:56 BST