--On Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:09 AM +0200 skutvik@online.no wrote:rr
> But as with
> somification (westerification) of it, a buddification (easternification)
> of it is also "poison". The unadulterated MOQ is the best tool to
> understand both worlds.
I agree whole heartedly. But if we are dealing with strict westerners (as
i thought i was) then often an eastern perspective helps balance the two
out so that the full apectrum of the MoQ can be seen. It's easy to put the
lack of Subject/object into wither a subjective or objective category. It
takes buddhist ideas to illustrate that particular error i think, if ZAMM
and Lila didnt do it already. There are alot more buddhist and taoist
wrttings, along with western writtings, that can be nice supplements to the
MoQ. The MoQ is neither west nor east, it is not a bridge between the two,
but a better explanation of both.
Elliot
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:14 BST