Hi Elliot, Andre,
--- elliot hallmark <onoffononoffon@hotmail.com> wrote:
> PS.
>
> To summarize, the inoganic and biological are patterns of Quality, and
> by
> extension patterns of consiousness. Is it our consiousness? rather,
> what
> we consider "our" consiousness is really just the same consiousness
> which is
> shared by all things, but the ego claims it for itself, divorcing
> itself
> from the uncarved block and the nature of the One Mind, making itself
> a
> subject and leaving objectness to all else. Reality is not all in
> your
> head, because your head is in the same consiousness as all else.
Well put.
You mentioned in your previous mail that inorganic and biological things
are conscious. Or in other words, they are self-sustained
value-patterns, according to the MoQ? So all is consciousness, and our
ego is but a finite part of All?
Okay, DQ is the Source, uncut value. Has it got a reality on its own, as
Andre seems to suggest (in my interpretation of Taoism = MoQ - SOM)?
And how do we explain our seperateness (an ego viewing imperfectly an
objective world) in terms of Quality? What has the MoQ to say about
this?
Just some questions. One more thing: If it's so difficult to transcend
the s-o split, how can we talk about a view on reality that is primary
to this?
Greetings, Patrick.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:20 BST