Glen, Platt And Ant:
Platt wrote: "......sooner or later we must admit that the MOQ espouses a
teleocosmos exhibiting goal directed movement......."
And Glen writes to me that: "You don't think that the MOQ solves the purpose
better than the other brands?".....and........"The universe evolves toward
Quality, Dynamic Quality."
Maybe I am just dense, but I don't see it. I am not arguing.......I really
don't see it. I will stick with my original borrowed quote......"A dynamic
does not necessarily imply a purpose .....it is a tempting fallacy to derive a
sense of purpose from a dynamic and see it as a spiritual frame.....".
Using Ant's definition of DQ as 'the continually changing flux of immediate
reality' doesn't help me get any closer to this whole purpose issue.
As we attempt to get our hands around DQ this month (and Ant has us off to a
great start), could we keep this purpose concept in mind? If MOQ does imply a
purpose, we should be able to clearly articulate it in a way that , at a
minimum, other students of MOQ understand. And right now I am not getting it.
So, effective for the rest of this month, I would like to offer the coveted
"Able to Educate the Thick Headed" award to anyone who can get me to
understand and agree with your definition of DQ and how it explains PURPOSE in
the universe.(Offer not valid in Ohio or Puerto Rico).
Be Good All!
Roger Parker
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:35 BST