Agian I apologise for the lateness of my reply I was either detained by
radioactive intelligent ants from Antarctica, or I was on a business trip. It's
hard to tell the difference sometimes.
RISKYBIZ9@aol.com wrote:
> don't see it. I will stick with my original borrowed quote......"A dynamic
> does not necessarily imply a purpose .....it is a tempting fallacy to derive a
> sense of purpose from a dynamic and see it as a spiritual frame.....".
I would agree that the MoQ is not a goal centered metaphysics. The MoQ doesn't
maintain the universe is evolving toward a particular, specific subset of
reality, but that it will evolve and eventually end up in a possible subset of
reality on all levels.
Can you think of Purpose without a Dynamic? Of what signifigance would a
Purpose without a Dynamic be? None, is what i'm thinking.
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:35 BST