Thu, 29 Oct 1998 Richard Budd wrote
> Bodvar-
> Just a personal note. I was only questioning the position of intellect
> over society as it was being described in the conversation about the two
> boys shooting their classmates. My point being that if intellect was
> thought of the way it was in that conversation (i.e.-planning an ambush)
> then it would have to arise from the biological level. I tried to extend
> this idea but was quickly set straight by Donny as to the "true" nature of
> the intellectual level. I think it's a good thing for all of us to
> continually question the structure of the MoQ. It's the only way we will
> ever be sure it will hold up to the scrutinization of "outsiders". Sorry
> for the confusion.
Hi Rick
No need for apology, I agree totally with what say about questioning
the structure of the MOQ, we make all sorts of thought experiments
see what the outcome will be. Not least yours sincerely ;-) !
Of course it is the Q-society and its position between Q-biology
and Q-intellect that makes the MOQ so unique, but also
controversial, so no wonder that doubts about its validity surfaces
again and again
Donny Palmgren said that the two of us had gone in circles over the
Biology-Society-Intellect interfaces and you asked for my angle to
it. That was so far back and so much stuff that it would overwhelm
you. It will probably emerge again if you stay with us.
Bodvar
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:36 BST