Re: MD re:the nature of natural law

From: Carmen Flynn (theflynn@dynamo.com.ar)
Date: Mon May 31 1999 - 03:26:58 BST


Bob and elg 14 + rest of LS,

"Well, well, someone else who studies the MoQ, the placement of natural
(discovered) law and its opposite (created law) and who has come to
essentially the same conclusions that I have. I wonder if he will have
the same problems that I have had convincing the socialists here how
utterly deluded they are--that their beliefs are absolutely opposed to
the MoQ?"

Carmen: First of all let me remind you both of another 'scientific fact':
The IQ test is not a good tool to measure 'intellect', it is a heavily biased tool to favor whites. Heavily Biased to benefit the so call 'non-minorities'.
I am against affirmative action, not because of the same reasons Bob and elg and the rest of the 'you'll be damn if you touch my Tax money to benefit such and such group'. Affirmative action is a 'bone thrown' to minorities to make them feel like somehow society is paying back for years of
exploitation without paid. Affirmative action doesn't even begin to scratch the surface of the Social Suffering that minority groups have had to endure.
Affirmative action: 'Thanks, but not thanks'. Take your Tax money and you know what you can do with it.
elg:
> First of all let me say that I'm not in a position to argue about "the little publicized scientific, historical and social fact that some racial groups are on >average genetically different in abilities to others, and therefore are on average more >suitable for certain types of employment."

Bob replies:

This is polite code for blacks having a mean average IQ of 85--one
standard deviation on the bell curve. The evidence is that it is
genetic. Whites have a mean average IQ of 100. Jews and Asians have a
mean average of 102. Jews and other whites score substantially higher on
verbal than Asians. Asians score substantially higher on mathematical.
The evidence is that all of this is stronger influenced by genetics.
This of course nearly impossible to discuss without being savagely
attacked because of the belief than everyone is equal.

Carmen: I wonder how the 'whites and Jews' would score in a test written on any of the Asian languages?. They wouldn't even know where to write their names.! (with a very few exceptions).
Bob :
And..."This of course nearly impossible to discuss without being savagely
attacked because of the belief than everyone is equal."
Carmen replies: Anyone who believes that statement better think again. You mean to say that the American Indians went over to Europe and 'took the land by force' that belonged to the Europeans with the use of more powerful weapons and a little help from biology (that is:'all the viruses' that the
American inhabitants had accumulated throughout ages.)..???? Knock!, knock!,... anyone home?
What should be done about it? if anything? Nothing. Western Civilization is paying the price for their 'blank crimes'. It is a story that is there for those who can 'see it'.

elg:
> First of all let me say that I'm not in a position to argue about "the little publicized scientific, historical and social fact that some racial groups are on average genetically different in abilities to others, and therefore are on average more suitable for certain types of employment."

Carmen replies: Que, QUE???. Sorry manito, but let me remind you 'employment' as we know it today is another way of 'slavery'. Most employers squeeze you dry and make you think that they are doing you a favor. That is a real crime. You guys are living in a Kaphian universe, please beam yourselves
down.

Bob Wallace wrote: elg14 wrote:
The evidence is that all of this is stronger influenced by genetics.
This of course nearly impossible to discuss without being savagelyattacked because of the belief than everyone is equal.

Carmen replies: Another reminder..... Asian societies, African people and American Indian (let's don't forget the native Australian) have live here in this Earth a lot longer than this 'New World Order' ( America is only about 223 years old) and heavily depending on 'hard sources of energy' and
technology. Two very fragile branches of a tree that could brake any moment.

>
>
> Bob:
> Well, well, someone else who studies the MoQ, the placement of natural
> (discovered) law and its opposite (created law) and who has come to
> essentially the same conclusions that I have. I wonder if he will have
> the same problems that I have had convincing the socialists here how
> utterly deluded they are--that their beliefs are absolutely opposed to
> the MoQ?

Carmen: HELLOOOOO, a couple of trees don't make a forest.

Buenos nachos!!!,
Carmenci.

>
>
> MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
> MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl

MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:59 BST