From: Elizaphanian (Elizaphanian@members.v21.co.uk)
Date: Fri Nov 01 2002 - 09:00:52 GMT
howdy Erin,
I think that the link between or equation of SOM and the (social) self is a
giant red herring. But I could be wrong.
Sam
www.elizaphanian.v-2-1.net/home.html
----- Original Message -----
From: "Erin N." <enoonan@kent.edu>
To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 12:16 AM
Subject: RE: MD Sophocles not Socrates
> howdy Sam,
> couple of more questions...
> When the 4th level was intellectual there were two the two
> intellectual patterns--SOM and MOQ?
> Can you also say that we have a SOM self and MOQ self?
> If MoQ takes away the subjective/objective, internal/external
> illusions then does it take away the idea that a person can
> be completely independent, or really have a separate self?
>
> erin
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 13:33:33 GMT