RE: MD Logic vs. reason

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:18:28 GMT

  • Next message: Peterfabriani@aol.com: "Re: MD Sophocles not Socrates"

    Hi Kevin:
     
    > I think Buff did a very fine job of illustrating just how careful we
    > must be when using the MOQ to sort through exactly these kinds of swampy
    > ethical situations. It's much more complex than you would like to paint it.
    > The MOQ is a method of sorting out the grays of ethics. If everything were
    > black & white, we wouldn't need the MOQ.

    Please show how the MoQ sorts out the "grays of ethics" in Chap. 24 of
    Lila. It appears to me that Pirsig makes many black & white moral
    judgments based on the MoQ. You may want to pay special attention to
    the part where Pirsig says that sympathy towards criminals and
    lawlessness is "really stupid."

    You may be right, he may be wrong, but I think I'm closer to reflecting
    the MoQ position regarding terrorists than you or Buff who seem to be
    suffering from what Pirsig calls intellectual moral "paralysis." While you
    agonize over the ifs, ands and buts of the ethical situation, terrorists
    target innocent civilians to kill by crashing planes into buildings and
    setting off explosives. That is just plain, unmitigated evil for which no
    rationalization, no justification, no excuse is possible in a civilized world.

    I'm thankful that the MoQ doesn't shrink from identifying and
    condemning evil biological behavior.

    Platt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:20:58 GMT