From: Peterfabriani@aol.com
Date: Thu Nov 07 2002 - 01:34:38 GMT
In a message dated 11/6/02 4:29:15 PM GMT Standard Time, speterson@fast.net
writes:
> > Peter: DQ would appear to hold everything, therefore everything is in fact
> > quality, but a differentiated aspect of it, i.e. a static pattern.
> Therefore,
> > everything is in DQ, which is close to a pantheistic belief that
> everything is
> > in God?
>
> Steve says:
>
> DQ and SQ are distinct from one another and together make up the whole of
> Quality. Nothing is in DQ.
>
Hello Steve,
You said Quality is a monism:
Steve says: Hmmmm...
I think you are making an unjustified leap, and I don't think that it's a
correct interpretation of the moq.
Quality is the One. The Everything. Un-definable and Indivisible, but
Pirsig decides to divide it anyway into static and dynamic. Under this
division every'thing' is a static pattern of quality and no'thing' has
Dynamic Quality in it.
Peter: Although no thing has DQ in it, DQ is everything.
Peter.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 01:35:35 GMT