Next message: Elizaphanian: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types ofValue)"
- Previous message: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "MD Right wingers."
- In reply to: Steve Peterson: "Re: MD levels"
- Next in thread: Elizaphanian: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types ofValue)"
- Reply: Elizaphanian: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types ofValue)"
- Maybe reply: Peterfabriani@aol.com: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types of Value)"
- Reply: Wim Nusselder: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Value, Up with Types of Patterns)"
- Maybe reply: Peterfabriani@aol.com: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types of Value)"
- Maybe reply: Peterfabriani@aol.com: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types of Value)"
- Maybe reply: Monkeys' tail or: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types of Value)"
- Maybe reply: Monkeys' tail or: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types of Value)"
- Maybe reply: Peterfabriani@aol.com: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types of Value)"
- Maybe reply: Peterfabriani@aol.com: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types of Value)"
- Maybe reply: Monkeys' tail or: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types of Value)"
- Maybe reply: Peterfabriani@aol.com: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types of Value)"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
I've heard from Magnus, but I haven't gotten any other feedback. Are people
in agreement, disagreement, or am I just being boring?
I guess I'll just keep trying to sell this idea.
Basically I'm arguing that we should stop talking about types of patterns
because they can't be categorized. Instead we should talk about ways of
valuing or types of awareness of patterns.
What are moral conflicts in light of this interpretation of the levels and
how are they resolved?
When all types of experience of Quality with regard to a particular pattern
of value are all in agreement, there is no moral conflict. For example,
sex within marriage has high biological and social value. No problem. There
may be no purely rational basis for restricting sex to within marriage, but
the intellect does not protest.
Moral conflicts result when different levels of awareness of the same
pattern of value involve conflicting experiences of Quality. For example,
experience of a Maplethorpe photograph may be one of high biological value
(it turns me on), low social value (it promotes promiscuity?), and high
intellectual value (????). How do we resolve the conflict?
The biological-social moral code says that the societal value must take
precedence over the biological value in such a case. The
social-intellectual code says that the high intellectual value of this
pattern of value (or the low intellectual value of censorship) must take
precedence over its low social value, and so such art should not be
censored.
Doesn't such an analysis make more sense than trying to figure out if the
photograph itself or the particular sex act itself is a particular type of
pattern?
Steve
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
- Next message: Elizaphanian: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types ofValue)"
- Previous message: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "MD Right wingers."
- In reply to: Steve Peterson: "Re: MD levels"
- Next in thread: Elizaphanian: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types ofValue)"
- Reply: Elizaphanian: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types ofValue)"
- Maybe reply: Peterfabriani@aol.com: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types of Value)"
- Reply: Wim Nusselder: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Value, Up with Types of Patterns)"
- Maybe reply: Peterfabriani@aol.com: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types of Value)"
- Maybe reply: Peterfabriani@aol.com: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types of Value)"
- Maybe reply: Monkeys' tail or: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types of Value)"
- Maybe reply: Monkeys' tail or: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types of Value)"
- Maybe reply: Peterfabriani@aol.com: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types of Value)"
- Maybe reply: Peterfabriani@aol.com: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types of Value)"
- Maybe reply: Monkeys' tail or: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types of Value)"
- Maybe reply: Peterfabriani@aol.com: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Patterns, Up with Types of Value)"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Fri Nov 08 2002 - 01:47:43 GMT