RE: MD traditions of mysticism

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sat Nov 09 2002 - 16:56:21 GMT

  • Next message: Steve Peterson: "Re: MD levels (Down with Types of Value, Up with Types of Patterns)"

    Sam said:
    In Ch3 (p35 of my copy) Phaedrus is considering the 'vision quest' and the
    peyote experience and copies in a reference, which concludes:
    "The experience is determined by the person's mental state, the structure of
    his or her personality, the physical setting, and cultural influences."

    dmb says:
    Right. The first experimenters with LSD discovered this right away. They
    referred to personality and mental state as the "set" and the actual
    location as the "setting". It became clear very quickly that having the
    right set and setting went a long way toward preventing "bad trips". The
    highly respected theologian Huston Smith describes this in CLEANSING THE
    DOORS OF PERCEPTION: The Religious Significance of Entheogenic Plants and
    Chemicals. (Entheogenic means something like "god-enabling".)

    Sam said:
    I would say that my understanding of tradition focusses on structuring of a
    personality and (obviously) the cultural influences. In addition, I would
    say that the tradition is - by and large - determinative of whether the
    experience has Quality (ie the difference between delusion and genuine
    insight). That comment lends itself to misunderstanding. I'm not saying that
    the tradition has the final say, more that the insight needs to be accepted
    as an insight by other people before it can be seen as having Quality (I
    suspect that's a tautology: people need to see it has Quality before they
    can see it has Quality (!). Not sure whether that's a suffocating or
    liberating tautology. Hmmm). Jesus, for example, was clearly rejected by the
    'tradition' he was embedded in, but elements of that tradition (the
    disciples) recognised his Quality, and developed a variant 'tradition' to
    static latch the Quality he embodied. If Jesus had not been recognised as
    having Quality, and if that recognition had not been incorporated within a
    communal tradition preserving the insight, he would have been forgotten
    after his death.

    dmb says:
    I think you're bringing in the issue of social evolution here, which is
    another topic altogether. This places a nearly impossible standard upon the
    mystical experience. But, as Huston Smith insists repeatedly, the trick is
    to make the experience effect some real and permanent change in one's self.
    This is quite enough, I think. Its first and foremost about discovering
    one's own true identity and divinity. But to expect it to create an
    evolutionary leap in the culture or generate a group of disciples puts the
    bar too high and is really a different kind of thing. Sure, Dynamic change
    is common to both and one person's transformation can lead to profound
    changes in the larger culture, but one is personal and is necessarily
    fleeting while the other takes time, political struggle, sometimes war and
    all kinds of practical work. You're not exactly comparing apples and
    oranges, its more like apples and orchards.

    Sam said:
    You referred to mystical experiences being 'noetic' - would you accept that
    your position is 'Jamesian' in the sense described? If not, why not? (I'm
    not wanting to put you into a box, I genuinely want to know how you
    understand your position).

    dmb says:
    James' description is basic and I have no problem with it, but there's a
    long-lost history and many good writers since James too. If you want a name
    for my position on mysticism, you can call it "fascinated enthusiasm".
    Remind me to tell you about Santa Claus and the shamanic tradition. Orpheus
    is connected to this realm in a big way too. Blake, Huxley, Morrision. The
    list goes on and on.

    Sam said:
    With regard to MacIntyre, Horse gives a very good introduction towards the
    end of Lila's Child, ...

    dmb says:
    You got me there. I don't yet have a copy of Lila's Child and I'm not
    familiar with MacIntyre.

    Thanks.

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 09 2002 - 16:56:09 GMT