Re: MD levels (Relativity)

From: Elizaphanian (Elizaphanian@members.v21.co.uk)
Date: Sat Nov 09 2002 - 18:58:35 GMT

  • Next message: Elizaphanian: "Re: MD traditions of mysticism"

    Hello Steve,

    Question in Lila's Child: Why did Pirsig write Lila?

    Pirsig's response: To explain why people differed about what has quality.

    In other words, it's not resolved in ZMM. I think the answer given in Lila
    is that people give different answers according to where they are on the
    scale of values (so Lila is intellectually nowhere etc). I don't think
    Pirsig recognises an 'absolute good', unless it is pure DQ.

    Sam
    www.elizaphanian.v-2-1.net/home.html

    > Platt and all,
    >
    > What is the resolution in ZAMM of the issue of why different papers get
    > different grades when graded by different professors? How is this
    relative
    > evaluation reconciled with absolute good in the moq? Are some of the
    > professors simply wrong while another is right about the paper's worth?
    Or
    > does each professor have a different experience of the same paper?
    >
    > Steve

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 09 2002 - 18:55:20 GMT