From: Steve Peterson (speterson@fast.net)
Date: Sat Nov 09 2002 - 17:51:55 GMT
> Hi Steve:
>
> A problem I see with your rejection of "types of patterns" is a
> consequent rejection of the hierarchy of values, i.e., some things are
> better than others. If, as you say, static patterns are relative to the
> individual, what's to stop him from claiming anything he does is moral? If
> everyone's values are equally good, logically everyone's values are
> equally worthless.
>
> Something seems to missing from your interpretation, or, more likely,
> I'm missing something.
>
> Platt
Platt and all,
What is the resolution in ZAMM of the issue of why different papers get
different grades when graded by different professors? How is this relative
evaluation reconciled with absolute good in the moq? Are some of the
professors simply wrong while another is right about the paper's worth? Or
does each professor have a different experience of the same paper?
Steve
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 09 2002 - 17:47:05 GMT