From: John Baxter (john@ebaxters.net)
Date: Tue Nov 12 2002 - 01:00:58 GMT
i thank each respondent to my post. i will become more personal as i
become more acquainted with each of you. i think my phrasing of my
questions confused a few and realize i could have done better. i will
try again...
my understanding of the moq is greatly lacking and i am currently
working with the handicap of being a SOM thinker. i am struggling with
the quality -> material link.
i read material objects are quality... they are composed of and by
quality. a quantum type concept i guess, hard to grasp. i envision
something like, quality is the fabric of space and value is our
perception of the harmonics of strings through time. a value would be
something which is experienced as a gradient of quality.
this issue rmp address to some degree as an issue for the SOM thinker
but i need more. i like my connection but it is from a limited
understanding and i am sure i am off base.
if quality "creates" reality... what is the meaning the levels of value?
would i not be comparing quality to quality... as if something could not
be quality... higher quality? higher then what? other quality? what is
the standard to compare to qualities? how could one tell which one is
higher? complexity = higher quality?
jb
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 12 2002 - 01:01:43 GMT