From: Peterfabriani@aol.com
Date: Tue Nov 12 2002 - 11:42:10 GMT
In a message dated 11/12/02 1:02:49 AM GMT Standard Time, john@ebaxters.net
writes:
> i read material objects are quality... they are composed of and by
> quality. a quantum type concept i guess, hard to grasp. i envision
> something like, quality is the fabric of space and value is our
> perception of the harmonics of strings through time. a value would be
> something which is experienced as a gradient of quality.
>
> this issue rmp address to some degree as an issue for the SOM thinker
> but i need more. i like my connection but it is from a limited
> understanding and i am sure i am off base.
>
> if quality "creates" reality... what is the meaning the levels of value?
> would i not be comparing quality to quality... as if something could not
> be quality... higher quality? higher then what? other quality? what is
> the standard to compare to qualities? how could one tell which one is
> higher? complexity = higher quality?
>
> jb
>
Hello jb,
Looks like you are onto things already? Your use of the harmony analogy
certainly resonates with me. And your use of the term gradient is interesting
- you are using lots of geometric analogies.
Geometry may be said to be composed of ratios, and in my view, ratio is a
Quality relationship. Thus, Quality produces ratio. Does this help at all?
Harmonics are composed of ratios also? Relationships of Quality - the more
beautiful the relationship the better the reality and ones perception of it.
Of course, one must remember that your ratios and those of the universe, so
to speak, are playing and moving together - it is a certain intellectual
outlook which may impose a feeling or notion of division?
Peter.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 12 2002 - 11:42:38 GMT