Re: MD life after death

From: Trivik Bhavneni (trivik@stwing.upenn.edu)
Date: Sun Dec 01 2002 - 06:49:14 GMT

  • Next message: Elizaphanian: "Re: MD "Mystical Experience" and static interpretations."

    > Colin Wilson on Wittgenstein.
    have not heard of the fellow

    > His self-loathing was not primarily focussed on his sexuality
    yes, but included.
    similar point below:

    > > if the interpretation is accepted by the person who penned the paragraph,
    > > then i see a contradiction.
    > > claim 1: i live my life based on quality.
    > > claim 2: quality exists (before/while/after i die)
    > > --------
    > > claim 3: my life is not based on a part of me that lives on
    > >
    > > 1 + 2 not equal to 3
    >
    > You'll need to unpack that a little, but it is intriguing. Claim 2 could
    > mean 'exist' in an eternal sense, whereas claim 3 seems to be using it in an
    > 'everlasting' sense.
    depending on the religeon, claim 3 may mean eaither.
    beut lets say we are talking about an interpretation of a religeon which
    takes it, as you say, to be everlasting.

    claim 2, is that quality exists. that may be accepted as a non-temporal
    claim (though temporality can be added).
    yes, to be eternal, to side step time, is a different goal to be ever
    esisting in time. However Quality does both. It is both. it is outside of,
    as well as within.
    Quality is everlasting and eternal.
    Now you claimed that you were not enamoured by everlasting, but by
    eternal, seeing eternal is what quality is. However everlasting is a
    subset of the same. It would not be quality if it were not also
    everlasting. Nor would it be quality if it were not eternal. So a religeon
    which only promises the ever lasting may not sway you, because you want
    more. But it is a prerequisite for what you are after.
    Like when the masses today say they are interested in the Intelectual
    Quality of their mates, they sort of presuppose some Biological Quality.
    <oh, and all the 'yous' up there are not refering to you you; just a
    manner of speaking.

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Dec 01 2002 - 06:49:50 GMT