Re: MD The Populist Persuasion

From: Elizaphanian (Elizaphanian@members.v21.co.uk)
Date: Wed Dec 11 2002 - 23:51:29 GMT

  • Next message: Matt the Enraged Endorphin: "Re: MD MOQ FOR DUMMIES, Please"

    Hi Matt, all.

    Something I came across. Stanley Cavell is noted Wittgenstein scholar,
    amongst other things:
    ( http://globetrotter.berkeley.edu/people2/Cavell/cavell-con3.html )

    Cavell: ....for the past 200 years, let's say, philosophers have been
    professors of philosophy. Kant is the philosopher that showed us that you
    can be a professor and produce great philosophy. It wasn't clear before.
    Descartes wasn't a professor of philosophy, Locke wasn't, Hume wasn't,
    Schopenhauer wasn't, Spinoza wasn't. But you could say of them and of their
    successors that they attempt to produce a system that answers the basic
    questions of existence. That system, or something of the sort, has since the
    17th century converged on questions of knowledge, rather than on the
    questions of beauty or of goodness, though every philosopher has some view
    of all of these things. Or, philosophers can undertake to question all
    efforts to create a system of philosophy. But in my book, the compulsion to
    systematization and the compulsion to question systematization are equal
    human drives. And so I question both of them.

    SC: Another way to test it is ... of course, we've all asked ourselves that.
    When I asked my philosophy teachers, I found myself doing this day and
    night, I said, "How do I know if I'm really doing this, if I'm really
    responding in a way that means anything to these texts or that means
    anything to anybody else but me?" And the awful and the wonderful thing is
    there really is no answer to this question. A famous story for some of us is
    that Wittgenstein, whom many of us do not doubt was an original and
    important philosopher, asked this question of Russell, "Am I a philosopher
    or am I a complete fool?" And Russell told him he wasn't a complete fool.
    But there's still a prior question, which is why Wittgenstein asked it of
    this person, and why this person was credible to him as an answerer. So, you
    pick your shots.

    ~~~~~~~~~~

    I thought that was rather good.

    Sam

    The actual outlook is very dark, and any serious thought should start from
    that fact. (George Orwell)

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 11 2002 - 23:47:39 GMT