Re: MD Pirsig a liberal?

From: Matt the Enraged Endorphin (mpkundert@students.wisc.edu)
Date: Wed Jan 08 2003 - 04:02:33 GMT

  • Next message: Glenn Bradford: "MD MOQ and Evidence (from Struan)"

    Platt,

    Agh, I forgot to reply to on this. You said:
    >Please explain what you mean by "privileged." Pirsig in the above quote
    >says dynamic and static are equally important. Privileged suggests not
    >equal, and has a pejorative ring to it.

    Your sniffer is right to pick it up, but as it happens I was trying to be
    descriptive. The perjorative of "privileged" comes from the postmoderns
    who don't think there can/should be a privileged context (Lyotard, Derrida,
    de Man, other deconstructionists [Culler, Gasche, Norris]). Deconstruction
    as a literary movement (which Derrida shouldn't really be included in)
    enjoys finding dualisms, figuring out which one is priveleged and going,
    "Yeah, look at that. How ar_bi_trary. Yeah. Got ya' now, sucka'" (or
    something like that). This isn't very interesting however. I mean, I
    thought it was widely recognized that Dynamic Quality is priveleged. I
    didn't think Pirsig said they were equal. He says both are _needed_, but
    he also says that DQ is the moral trump card over all static patterns.
    That's what I mean by privelege. If a half of the dichotomy trumps the
    other one.

    I think it is merely descriptive. A deconstructionist would come along and
    try to "explode" the dichotomy somehow. Deconstructionists are notoriously
    suspicious of binaries. Following Rorty, however, I wouldn't know how you
    could do without binaries. Its the reifying of them that's the problem. I
    don't see a problem with the priveleging of DQ because A) I don't want to
    reify or hypostatize it metaphysically and B) I don't think we can tell
    what DQ is until much later afterwards. If that's the case, then its a
    compliment paid to good stuff that happens and we needn't never worry about
    arbitrarily privileging a choice as "absolute" because we'll never know
    which choice is the "absolutely good one, now and forever" at the time of
    its choosing. That's why I don't take the absoluteness of DQ that seriously.

    Matt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 08 2003 - 03:57:50 GMT