From: Patrick van den Berg (cirandar@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Jan 09 2003 - 13:38:50 GMT
Hi Marc,
> Hi Patrick,
>
> Mostly just lurking but I couldn't resist reacting on this.
That's fine! Somehow my last 3 posts were not replied to... nobody
boycotting me for some reason I hope? ;-)
> Marc:
>
> 6 Most of these methods refer to a Quality of Time, meaning each time
> has its own kind of special quality. My article on astrology consisted
> also an interview with a philosopher who devoted lots of his time to
> astrology. He claimed, and I liked this one, that the problem with the
> normal view is that man considers himself as a subject opposed to an
> objective world surrounding him. Like watching a movie f.e. But, he
> stated, by doing that you forget that man in basic, originally, is
> made
> of the same parts, as his 'natural' surroundings. (I quess he refered
> to
> molecules, dna...)
Uhm, you're at the right place if you're looking for discussing
philosophy that claims the subject-object distinction is secondary, a
construct of some kind.
Are you suggesting that the workings of nature are essentially the same
as our own human functioning? If so, how do you explain synchronicity
then? You don't make that too explicit.
Greetings, Patrick.
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 09 2003 - 13:39:22 GMT