From: Erin N. (enoonan@kent.edu)
Date: Sat Jan 11 2003 - 17:16:56 GMT
>===== Original Message From moq_discuss@moq.org =====
>HI ALL.
>
>Why is it that SOM intellect creates a more advanced and dynamic quality
>than those indians Pirsig talks about, who are supposed to be suspicious to
>SOM and more intuitive to dynamic quality? You would think that indians
>should have more advanced modes of living. This isn't the case though. Why?
1. You might want to see Wim and Rog discuss of progress in society in the
archives. My guess is the conceptions of progress and advancement
would be defined differently.
Not sure but maybe there is a SOM advanced and MOQ advanced?
2. pg64
you should also include Indians influence on modern times in
this assessment
" Mahoney has spent the last ten years looking into
Sidis work. In one dusty attic, he found a bulky
manuscript called the "Tribes and the States" in hwich Sidis argue
persuasively that the New England political system was
profoundly influenced by the democratic federation of
the Penacoook Indians"
3. I think your question is interesting because it
touches on justice. I am not sure what the MoQ says about justice.
I wonder if it has to do with what levels are dominating in
the world. If you are X-level dominated person and the world
you live in is also X-level dominated maybe you perceive
there to be more justice then somebody dominated by a
higher or lower level?
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 11 2003 - 17:09:47 GMT