From: zykaine telex (zykaine@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Jan 10 2003 - 23:21:39 GMT
HI ALL.
Why is it that SOM intellect creates a more advanced and dynamic quality
than those indians Pirsig talks about, who are supposed to be suspicious to
SOM and more intuitive to dynamic quality? You would think that indians
should have more advanced modes of living. This isn't the case though. Why?
Simple questions that, for myself, need to be answered before I can begin to
accept that SOM is more immoral to dynamic quality (change) than intuitive
indian or buddhist thinking. If dynamic quality is the empirical reality, as
Pirsig states for MOQ, then SOM must be more moral as it's more dynamic. No?
I have some more questions, but these will do for now.
Regards,
Zykaine.
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 10 2003 - 23:21:55 GMT