From: Ilya Korobkov (korobkov_ilya@mail.ru)
Date: Wed Aug 04 2004 - 13:05:01 BST
Hi Mark,
Thank you very much for support! I was greatly encouraged by your
letter.
Vac> I hope you use the MOQ as the basis for your postgraduate studies Ilya?
Well, yes. I feel that orthodox psychology gives inadequate
description of what a man is. And I wish to fix it. Although I foresee it
wouldn't be an easy task.
Now I want to ask a question. Remember this fragment from Lila:
<<..."Does Lila have Quality?"
Biologically she does, socially she doesn't.
Biologically she's fine, socially she's pretty far down the scale,
intellectually she's nowhere. But Dynamically . . .
Ah! That's the one to watch. There's something ferociously Dynamic
going on with her...>>
1. Can we say that person A is more Dynamic then person B?
2. Can we say that person A at a moment of time t1 is more Dynamic then
he himself was at a moment of time t2?
3. If we can, what would that mean metaphysically? Does "dynamicness"
depend on how stable this person's static patterns are? - Or quite the
contrary, the stableness of a person's static patterns depend on how
Dynamic he is?
4. By what signs can we tell more Dynamic person from less Dynamic
person?
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Aug 04 2004 - 13:20:53 BST