Re: MD DQ & emergence & consciouness

From: Dan Glover (daneglover@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Aug 06 2004 - 21:32:41 BST

  • Next message: MarshaV: "Re: MD MOQ, Intellect, DQ and Woman"

    Hello everyone

    >From: "Joseph Maurer" <jhmau@sbcglobal.net>
    >Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    >To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    >Subject: Re: MD DQ & emergence & consciouness
    >Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:34:39 -0700
    >
    >
    >joe: i am trying to put precise word boundaries on the mystical and
    >degenerate-mystical world of the MOQ. In the mystical world of MOQ I see
    >EVOLUTION, DYNAMIC QUALITY, GRAVITY, PURPOSE, EXISTENCE, and UNFINISHED
    >SQ/DQ. All else is SQ degenerate-mystical experience. Mystical is not
    >subjective nor objective. IMO DQ and EXISTENCE are mystical experiences.
    >They are brought together simultaneously in an evolved being of four levels
    >in separate levels. A sentence that reads: "DQ brought the SQ pattern of a
    >photon into existence.": translates into ? I see light. I cannot say that
    >DQ
    >exists nor how it exists, I can only experience it mystically.

    Hi Joe

    If you permit I'll try a small change to your last and note the effect on
    your first: I see light. I cannot say that light exists or how it exists, I
    can only experience it.

    Not too long ago there was a furor over a researcher's claim that the speed
    of gravity had been accurately measured for the first time. It was pointed
    out by a number of other researchers that the experiment was set up in such
    a fashion that only the measuring instruments themselves pertained to the
    results. The only feature the experiment measured was the instrument's
    reaction, not a direct gravity wave as was first speculated.

    By analogy when we measure the speed of light we have no way of knowing just
    what it is that we're measuring. I see light. But the light I see isn't the
    light I see if you follow my meaning; it's an electro-biological reaction in
    my brain that I see. That it seems is the speed of light.

    Degenerate quality and Dynamic Quality can only be identified in retrospect.
    Once you've put up boundaries on the mystical it's no longer mystical. I
    think the MOQ would say there's just experience -- evolution, Dynamic
    Quality, gravity, purpose, existence and unfinished sq/dq are all
    intellectual patterns of value -- but experience is Dynamic in the sense
    that we can never define all of reality. Experience might be called a
    Dynamic process (freedom) of defining static patterns of value (order).

    >
    >
    >(talking to myself) All right, Wise guy, what is Time and Space? I need
    >help.(sigh)

    Well, first off I talk to myself quite a lot too and sometimes I even seem
    to sigh like that.(sigh) Secondly, I'm not a Wise guy, but from what I
    understand the MOQ says that time and space are some of the first concepts
    to arise. Since they're the first it's meaningless to ask arise from what or
    where.

    Thank you for your comments,

    Dan

    _________________________________________________________________
    Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
    http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Aug 06 2004 - 21:46:16 BST