Re: MD Proposal to discuss a Metaphysics of Value

From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Sat Aug 07 2004 - 18:54:40 BST

  • Next message: hampday@earthlink.net: "Re: MD Proposal to discuss a Metaphysics of Value"

    Hi,

    Thanks for your proposal.

    In poking around your website, I've read many interesting ideas. The
    first one to catch my attention was this:

    "Today we find ourselves terrorized by a horde of suicidal fanatics
    bent on destroying Western Civilization in the name of a deity that
    shows no regard for the value of human life."

    And I thought to myself, yes these fanatics might very well destroy
    Western Civilization but, for the last few years at least, their
    brutal fanaticism has been focused on mass destruction in the Middle
    East and Central Asia, specifically in Iraq and Afghanistan,
    resulting so far, in the slaughter of maybe 30,000 innocents.

    Then I thought, in defense of those who are comforted by
    Christianity, it seems unfair to attribute to the Christian God no
    regard for human life, just because these fanatics, who claim they
    are acting in his name, have none.

    But then I read this, and saw the light:
    "Those entrusted with the security of our land look to public polls
    for the issues and judgments that will determine its future."

    Hand-slap to forehead. Damn. He's talking about Muslim extremists,
    not the Bush administration! And then was wafted my way the sickly
    scent of jingoism. But I kept reading anyway.

    I then turned to your sixth essay, on Freedom, and was greeted by
    wonderfully waving American Flag. Here I read:

    "In the interest of America's future, I would add a caveat of my own:
    A free society is not immune to the laws of gravity; left to its own
    devices it runs downhill."

    Yes, I thought. And this would be the perfect place to mention the
    most recent attacks on freedom in America, such as the Patriot Acts,
    and other legislation. But I was disappointed. Instead there's
    this:

    "History has shown that establishing and maintaining a free society
    is typically a hard-won struggle led by enlightened individuals who
    appreciate its value and are ever vigilant to protect it from those
    who through public apathy, geopolitical envy, religious fanaticism,
    or the abuse of power would allow its downfall."

    This is the myth of the enlightened leader as the catalyst of
    freedom. The reality is that freedoms are won, and maintained,
    through the combined efforts of countless individuals, almost all of
    whom struggle, and often die, and remain nameless.

    Then comes:

    "The legacy of secularism has fostered a generation of morally
    bankrupt dependents who worship at the altar of Celebrity and submit
    only to an ethic of "political correctness", as if existence had no
    other purpose."

    I'm always concerned when so much negativity is blamed on poor old
    secularism. So now, it's clear that you not only have a nationalist
    agenda, but a religious one as well.

    I then hopped to your "Value In The Balance" page where I'm treated
    to another waving American flag, and I get a chance to see your two
    agendas coalesce with a third, political agenda: Anyone who might
    suggests that terrorism is not the greatest danger we face is one of
    those "liberals" behind the "Hate Bush" campaign.

    All in all, you offer a pretty neat little tripartite package: God,
    guns, and country, not necessarily in that order. You'll enjoy a
    great affinity with the views of at least one of this lists regular
    contributors.

    As for me, I find unattractive and malignant any value-based
    philosophy that fails to reveal the extremely low-quality underlying
    nationalism (or tribalism of any kind), which fails to identify the
    highly artificial and violently enforced nature of the world's nation-
    state system, and which, apparently, assigns different levels of
    value to beings based upon their geographical and religious
    circumstances.

    Regards,
    Mark Steven Heyman (msh)
    --
    InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
    Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
    Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com

    "Thought is only a flash between two long nights, but this flash is
    everything." -- Henri Poincare'

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Aug 07 2004 - 19:06:31 BST