From: Charles Roghair (ctr@pacificpartssales.com)
Date: Sun Aug 08 2004 - 23:45:32 BST
Hello everybody,
Would Heidegger's "Being and Time" be of any help here? If your
talking about "just about everything in life, the universe and
everything, " well that sounds to me a lot like ontology.
Heidegger asks, "what does everything have in common?"
His answer is "Being." "Being," therefore, must be the most universal
of concepts. While everyone has an innate, a priori knowledge of
being, a working definition remains elusive – our understanding, vague
and difficult to describe.
Because being is permanent flux? Hyper Dynamic? Of highest Quality?
Best regards,
C.
On Aug 8, 2004, at 2:01 PM, David Morey wrote:
> Hi DMB
>
> Ever read Marcuse's One Dimensional Man? -
> good discussion in it on the political conformity
> of science. Quality has more to offer
> then instrumentalism.
>
> regards
> David M
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Buchanan" <DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org>
> To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 8:46 PM
> Subject: RE: MD MOQ psycology (?)
>
>
>> Ilya and Ian:
>>
>> Ian Glendinning said:
>> My catch-all term for describing just about everything
>> in life, the universe and everything, MoQ included,
>> is "Evolutionary Psychology".
>>
>> dmb says:
>> This reminds me of an author that Ilya might want to investation, the
>> evolutionary psychologist Ken Wilber. I don't think its exactly right
>> to
> say
>> his work is based on the MOQ's assumptions, but his work and Pirsig's
>> are
>> both based on the same assumtions.
>>
>> Ian said:
>> The word "scientific" fills me with dread in the proposal here.
>> Does everything still need to be "scientific" (ie politically correct)
>> to be taken seriously these days ?
>>
>> dmb says:
>> Huh? How do you figure? What is dreadful about the word "scientific"?
>> How
> do
>> you figure the word has anything to do with being politically
>> correct? I'm
>> sorry Ian, but this doesn't make any sense.
>>
>> On second thought, never mind. Don't bother trying to explain.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> dmb
>>
>>
>> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
>> Mail Archives:
>> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
>> Nov '02 Onward -
> http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
>> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>>
>> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
>> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>>
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archives:
> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Nov '02 Onward -
> http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Aug 09 2004 - 01:57:32 BST