From: Patrick van den Berg (cirandar@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Jan 12 2003 - 15:49:45 GMT
Hi John, Platt, others,
(Sorry for the many parantheses, I hope you can follow the gist of this
post.)
> Do you believe in the 'good' of men?
>
> Self interest is a greater motivator, If it is seen that being good is
> the
> best option then thats how the majority will go. I have no doubt that
> my
> community would pin me to the wall if it would keep their own family
> safe.
> Personal freedom will be the first thing to go in our brave new world.
To respond on the first sentence (although the other few lines is I
think a very brief but sharp analysis): Yes. I fear that you are right:
that people aren't good in principle; and (what I left unsaid) that
their wrongdoings are due merely to bad conditioned habits
(evolutionary, culturally) or due to personal trauma's in childhood, but
indeed: that self-interest is a greater motivator than the motivation to
act in Accordance with the Good.
A certain mystic has said once that the whole human race suffers from a
disease: the ego. What I know from the enlightened state, is that it
seems that a spin-off of this state is that you're not selfish anymore.
Hate as a feeling disappears (although everything else remains exactly
the same, although 180 degrees reversed, as a dutch Zen-disciple has
said). Philosophically, it all boils down to the nature of time, or
rather: causality. Evolutionary theory is 100% a causal theory. We
humans pride ourselves with our intellect. Abstactizing, imagining
scenario's that might happen, was evolutionary benefitial, 'cause
imagining cases in which you die while hunting obviously doesn't result
in you actually dying, etc. But abstractizing means holding on to static
concepts. So the 'I' was born. Thus, natural selection 'favored' humans
that imagined things (and thus created static constructs, and thus the
'I'), by creating (bad word, bad word) a positive feeling (call it
'curiousity') when humans engaged in this imaginative thinking. (note
that I divide subjective feelings and causal powers... to explain why I
do so, see the 'emergence'-thread...)
This positive feeling, the delurance of the power of the 'I', can thus
be *causally* explained. In this light we might understand Pirsig's
motivation to look with another pair of glasses to what we call
'causality' (i.e. his claim that 'a has caused b' means 'b favors
pre-condition a'). We also might understand that the enlightened state
is all about 'living in the now', i.e. fully allowing undefinable,
uncertain DQ to do its work.
(I sometimes wonder if an enlightened person would care to pursue a
career in string-theory. Theoretical physics is all about finding (or
'creating') static constructs by which you can build up (compute) every
known phenomenon in the physical world.)
In summary, the selfisness of man is an artifact of some sort in the
causal game of evolution. You can interpet the proposition 'all men are
good in principle' in two ways. First, you can think this is a 'true'
proposition, since you might conceive that we all were born without the
'I' being formed yet (tabula rasa), . (and, there are humans who have
attained enlightenment). Second, you can think this is a 'false'
statement, because humans are so easily and massively delured to fall
into the trap of imaginative thinking (creating s-constructs or
absolutes, creating an 'I') once we reach the age of two: humans are a
fluke of nature, because the game of causality drags them down in
particular, compared to the rest of the animal kingdom.
Hm, Platt, and Kevin also, if you've come this far: I find writing these
philophical things (good or bad) so much easier than discussing ethics
and answering the question of what we ought to do. I'd like to delve
deeper in intellectual ponderings, instead of creating a strong opinion
about e.g. racial issues and decide to act in spite of all doubts and
incomplete knowledge... But of course I think about political issues (in
10 days, we in the Netherlands have elections again). The summary of the
political debate in the Netherlands by GJ was a good one by the way.
Maybe soon I'll 'stick my neck out', and give an attackable political
opinion on certain issues in dutch society... Wim, I hope you will give
your opinion, as Platt asked us dutchmen, on muslim groups and the whole
of political matters in geneneral currently at hand here in Holland...
Friendly greetings, Patrick.
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jan 12 2003 - 15:50:37 GMT