RE: MD "linear causality"

From: Matt the Enraged Endorphin (mpkundert@students.wisc.edu)
Date: Sun Jan 12 2003 - 18:18:57 GMT

  • Next message: Steve Peterson: "Re: MD Pirsig, a Zen person"

    Erin,

    Erin said:
    well i think you both are way off....it is clear
    Pirsig moves science to the left :-).

    Matt:
    See, now that's funny.

    Erin said:
    Where does Pirsig say science has found the Real Way towards Truth?
    I think Pirisg points out the art of science, pointing
    out the aspect of creating the truth not just finding
    the truth in facts about arts.
    If that is bringing science up or down probably depends
    on your opinion of art;-)

    Matt:
    One of the passages I'm thinking of is in ZMM Ch. 19 (beginning) when
    Pirsig discusses the choice between making Quality in the subject or
    object. "Because if Quality exists in the object, then you must explain
    just why scientific instruments are unable to detect it." This establishes
    the tight link between the object and objectivity and science. "On the
    other hand, if Quality is subjective, existing only in the observer, then
    this Quality that you make so much of is just a fancy name for whatever you
    like." This establishes the opposite link and the derision.

    Pirsig does point out the art of science, which is why there is an ego
    readjustment for scientists who thought that science was "above" art. What
    I'm suggesting is that people with residual scientism, while possibly
    enjoying art, look down on it as a cultural activity insofar as artists
    claim to be adding something to Knowledge or Truth. For them, science is
    the only activity that can lead to Knowledge and Truth, and for the most
    part, following Plato's lead, they think that that is the highest pursuit
    of all. What a philosopher like Pirsig wants to do is say, "Wait, wait,
    wait. Knowledge and Truth are the highest pursuits, but science does not
    have a monopoly on this." I'm arguing that the language Pirsig uses to
    open up the pursuit of Knowledge and Truth implies the expansion of the
    meaning of science. I'm further saying that I wish he hadn't done this,
    that it would have been better for him to say that their are different
    kinds of knowledge and that science provides knowledge of one kind and
    literary criticism of another.

    Matt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jan 12 2003 - 18:13:35 GMT