Re: MD PhD Viva Questions

From: David Morey (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Thu Aug 12 2004 - 22:18:40 BST

  • Next message: David Morey: "Re: [Spam] Re: MD the metaphysics of free enterprise"

    Hi Anthony

    Hope it went well, interesting to see what was asked.

    regards
    David M

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: <ant.mcwatt@ntlworld.com>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Cc: <qtx@earthlink.net>
    Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 6:33 PM
    Subject: MD PhD Viva Questions

    > Dear all,
    >
    > Just to let anyone interested that the viva went pretty well on Tuesday
    though I have yet to hear from the University concerning a final decision in
    regards of being awarded a PhD.
    >
    > In the meantime, I'd just like to thank everyone on this Board for their
    usually insightful debates in regard to the MOQ. I think these discussions
    since 1997 have certainly helped in sharpening my own ideas in regards to
    Pirsig's work.
    >
    > Anyway, I thought you might be interested in the type of questions asked
    in the context of an MOQ PhD viva so (before I forget them!) I paste some of
    the questions posed by my examiners below. I'll forward my answers later on
    (probably at the end of next week) to give other people an opportunity to
    discuss them.
    >
    > Best wishes,
    >
    > Anthony.
    >
    > P.S. I was speaking to Doug Renselle (one of the original founders of MOQ
    Discuss) recently. He is busy as ever with his Quantonics site and sends
    his best regards to everyone.
    >
    > ------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    >
    > 1. Is Quality more similar to:
    >
    > a. Whitehead's Process Philosophy,
    >
    > b. the Tao, or;
    >
    > c. Plotinus' One?
    >
    >
    > 2.a. There are at least seven terms for Quality in your thesis (e.g.
    Value, harmony, excellence) how can they all be the same thing? How does,
    for example, a table relate to these?
    >
    > b. What is the observer and its relation to the table in terms of Quality?
    >
    >
    > 3. If you kill the self then isn't this a quick return to the Dynamic and
    therefore a moral action in Pirsig's MOQ?
    >
    >
    > 4.a. How does an increase of complexity lead to harmony?
    >
    > b. How can a Schonenberg Concert which is purposively disharmonic fit into
    this paradigm?
    >
    >
    > 5.a. How does the MOQ improve on James' pragmatism? How does this relate
    to the Nazi Holocaust?
    >
    > 5.b. How does this issue relate to the treatment of animals like pigs by
    human beings?
    >
    >
    > 6. Your thesis suggests that the MOQ states that we should be moral
    essentially for future generations' sake rather than being awarded an
    afterlife or reincarnation. In this regard, what you would you say to
    someone who said that they didn't care about future generations?
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------end----------
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > -----------------------------------------
    > Email provided by http://www.ntlhome.com/
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Aug 12 2004 - 23:43:11 BST