From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Fri Aug 13 2004 - 01:38:08 BST
Hi Mark
I have not read any Wilber. Precisely what is wrong with his
metaphysics and how does it differ to MOQ?
thanks
David M
Hi David,
Ken Wilber does not present a coherent metaphysics, but the metaphysical
assumptions underlying his writings may be teaselled out so to speak. A good
analysis of this is at: http://trumpeter.athabascau.ca/content/v17.1/rowe.html
I can't say it is wrong, but it does not make for good philosophy in my view.
Apart from this i would say see for yourself David? Ken Wilber may be for
you? You are a free thinking critical person.
I've read many articles by KW which have made good reading and enjoyed them.
However, these are far outweighed by material i found to be very depressing,
especially when reflecting upon gullible nature from which, sound intellect may
not guarantee protection.
All the best,
Mark
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Aug 13 2004 - 01:39:05 BST