Re: MD Proposal to discuss a Metaphysics of Value

From: David Morey (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Sat Aug 14 2004 - 12:56:23 BST

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: [Spam] Re: MD the metaphysics of free enterprise"

    Hi Anthony

    Nice to hear such a considered and balanced
    perspective.

    Regards
    David M
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: < >
    To: < >
    Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2004 2:45 AM
    Subject: MD Proposal to discuss a Metaphysics of Value

    > On August 12th, Scott Roberts asked Ham Priday:
    >
    > Do you consider the Patriot Act to be a help or a
    > hindrance to freedom?
    >
    > On August 12th, Ham Priday replied:
    >
    > The answer depends on whether you believe (as I do) that our nation is
    under attack and that we are currently at war with the terrorist factions.
    >
    > Ant McWatt comments:
    >
    > That's not exactly accurate or (to put it in MOQ terms) not the highest
    quality interpretation of recent events in the States and Europe i.c.w.
    terrorist action.
    >
    > The only factions under real threat in the United States and Europe are
    the ruling elites due to their actions abroad (by proxy) in attempting to
    control foreign resources and particularly oil. And even that threat to
    them is minimal and grossly exaggerated.
    >
    > The Bush's and their close business associates since the mid-1970s, the
    Bin Laden's (who presently control Saudi Arabia) were probably shocked as
    anybody else that a black sheep of the latter's family instigated those
    disgusting acts of violence on 9-11 though (after they recovered their
    composure) it did give the Bush-Bin Ladens an excuse to invade Iraq,
    introduce laws such as the Patriot Act to limit the freedoms of the general
    U.S. population and instil an irrational fear in the majority of the
    populace through a continuing and largely fictional war. Very cynical but
    remember they make billions of dollars from oil (and associated industries)
    and any other spin offs that reduces the power of anyone else is an
    additional bonus.
    >
    > To use a quote of Pirsig's from LILA, the recent "War on Terror" is "just
    the usual cover-up for the rich in their age-old exploitation of the poor."
    The primary exploitation being through taxes and the use of man power. As
    an American taxpayer I'd certainly want a refund of the 70 billion that has
    already been spent sending working and lower-middle class kids to secure
    Iraqi oil for the Bush-Bin Ladens. I'd also want to know, amongst other
    questions, why the children of only one US senator are currently on military
    service in Iraq and why thirty planes flew out of the States on September
    13th 2001 to transport various members of the Bin Laden family (without any
    questioning) back to Saudi Arabia.
    >
    > Ham Priday stated August 12th:
    >
    > It seems to me that, considering the circumstances, the American community
    must be willing to give up certain civil liberties (including the right of
    foreigners to enter our borders) in the interest of preserving Freedom for
    all, just as a child must be deprived of certain liberties in order to learn
    how to exercise personal Freedom responsibly in a free society.
    >
    > Ant McWatt comments:
    >
    > It's depressing to read this as once I would have believed the sentiments
    regarding civil liberties as sincerely as Ham (and no doubt Platt) does. It
    is also certainly a pity that Bush Junior hasn't taken on board the
    pertinent sentiment about exercising personal Freedom responsibly. From the
    MOQ perspective, the most damaging effect by the "War on Terror" is on
    Dynamic Quality. If, for instance, the free flow of people, ideas and trade
    is restricted within the States (on tenuous grounds) the Dynamism of its
    social and intellectual systems is correspondingly reduced. The potential
    for Dynamic development in all fields in the States is tremendous and it is
    matter of concern to see this potential being held back. It's one thing to
    be personally greedy (as no doubt the Bush-Bin Ladens are) but to compromise
    the free trade of industry and culture outside the oil industry is extremely
    selfish and short-sighted.
    >
    > It's very difficult to think what action a free thinking individual can do
    to help matters. Ensuing oneself is educated (not necessarily in the formal
    sense) through reading and analysing as many non-corporate/independent
    information sources as possible is certainly one worthwhile pursuit. Power
    elites depend on the mass populace to be ignorant in order to help them keep
    power. I'm not too sure that it would radically improve matters - that
    much - to vote Democrat in the forthcoming election but the removal of the
    Bush element from political power in the States would at least be a step in
    the right direction. (BTW, it's pretty clear now that Bush Junior lost the
    last presidential election - as revealed by the shocking events in Florida
    during the 2000 election - definitely worth finding out about).
    >
    > Ham Priday stated August 12th:
    >
    > Cynics like yourself no longer believe what Government tells them, hence
    convince themselves that it's all a ploy by the politicians to win votes.
    Unfortunately, the cynicism that prevents our seeing objective reality as it
    > is won't make the terrorist threat go away.
    >
    > Ant McWatt finally comments:
    >
    > Unfortunately, the gullibility that prevents our seeing "objective"
    reality as it is, won't make the ruling elites or their static orientated
    behaviour go away either. Moreover, it's rarely a good idea to believe any
    politician (of whatever political persuasion) on face value.
    >
    > Best wishes,
    >
    > Ant.
    >
    > (P.S. No quotes from the Murdoch corporate media please, Platt!)
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > -----------------------------------------
    > Email provided by http://www.ntlhome.com/
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries -
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries -

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Aug 14 2004 - 13:17:04 BST