Re: MD Fox News and Logical Analysis

From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Wed Aug 18 2004 - 16:34:02 BST

  • Next message: Mark Steven Heyman: "Re: MD MOQ and The Problem Of Evil"

    On 18 Aug 2004 at 7:45, Platt Holden wrote:

    MSH has obviously not read or
    chose to ignore "The Connection" by Stephen Hayes

    msh says:
    Platt proves my point. Hayes is a staff writer for The Weekly
    Standard (owned by Murdoch), a regular commentator on Fox (owned by
    Murdoch), who's book (pumped and pumped and pumped by Fox) is
    published by Harper Collins (owned by Murdoch). Hayes' journalistic
    efforts are contributions to The New York Post (Murdoch), Washington
    Times (right-wing whacko Sun Yung Moon), etc etc etc.

    The "cozy" connections he writes of are really more of a "connect the
    dots" (his words) reliance on things like "open source" news
    articles, transcripts from the 1998 embassy bombing trials, as well
    as conveniently anonymous intelligence reports and informants.
    Hayes himself has said that many of these stories may prove
    unreliable. Add to this the convenient absence of source notes and
    no knowledge of what cooperative efforts ever came of these supposed
    contacts. So what's the point of this exercise? Take a look at his
    own credential and links to Murdoch, and the point becomes obvious.

    You might be more persuasive, Platt, if you can find even one
    supporting study of this issue, preferably one conducted by someone
    not on Murdoch's payroll.

    Besides, if it's cozy terror relationships wou're interested in, why
    not look at the indisputable Bush-Bin Laden family and business
    friendship?

    platt:
    Besides trying to convince us of a ridiculous notion that the media
    is conspiring with the administration,

    msh:
    Please. Not this treadmill again. One more time: This is not a
    conspiracy at all. Major commercial media outlets are also major
    corporations, usually owned by bigger corps making up the Industrial
    side of the Military-Industrial Complex. Their institutional goal is
    to maximize profit. War is great for profit in two obvious ways: the
    transfer of tax dollars into private pockets via weapons manufacture
    and maintence; and the expansion of markets and resources that always
    comes with conquest. The profit is especially impressive when
    others are paying the physical and financial price.

    This isn't a conspiracy. Just good business.

    Mark Steven Heyman (msh)

    -- 
    InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
    Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
    Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com
    "Thought is only a flash between two long nights, but this flash is 
    everything."  -- Henri Poincare'
    MOQ.ORG  - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward  - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Aug 18 2004 - 16:29:01 BST