RE: MD Fox News and Logical Analysis

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Mon Aug 23 2004 - 02:08:12 BST

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD The individual in the MOQ"

    Mark, Ian and all MOQers:

    Mark said:
    "logic might and sometimes does produce better results."

    Ian replied:
    I say therefore, not because of the logic, but in spite of the logic. Not
    actually connected with the logic in any causal way.

    dmb says:
    Ian, you are using terms is very idiosyncratic ways and confusing categories
    like retail politics and the philosophy of science. I mean, you're not
    denying that logic is a good and useful thing in practical matters such as
    the causes of war or bridge construction, are you? Check the thread name and
    notice the topic, will you? We're talking about the relative merits of
    various news organizations, where facts and logic, conventionally speaking,
    mean everything. Get with the program, will ya pal?

    Ian continued:
    Doxastic. Just wishful thinking. A desire to believe in logic. A refusal to
    believe real (human) world outcomes are emergent from much more mysterious
    (complex that is, not mystic) relationships than classical "scientific"
    logic. (And highly politically incorrect for me suggest logic is just
    wishful thinking, or that science is just political correctness.) What I'm
    amazed by, given that this is an MOQ discussion board that so many
    people defend the SOM logic.

    dmb replies:
    Oh, now I see what you were trying to say last week. Again, you are using
    terms in a very strange way. You're using 'political correctness' to mean
    something like 'the dominant paradigm' or 'the scientific worldview". If
    anyone other than you uses 'political correctness' in this way, I'm unaware
    of it and such a definition does not even resemble the definition I know.
    From wordiQ.com...

    Political correctness
    Political correctness is the alteration of language said to redress real or
    alleged unjust discrimination or to avoid offense. The term most often
    appears in the predicate adjective form politically correct, often
    abbreviated PC, and is usually used mockingly or disparagingly. One purpose
    behind politically correct language is to prevent the exclusion or the
    offending of people based upon differences or handicaps. The idea behind
    using politically correct terminology is to bring peoples' unconscious
    biases into awareness, allowing them to make a more informed choice about
    their language and making them aware of things different people might find
    offensive. The new terms are often awkward, euphemistic substitutes for the
    original stark language concerning differences such as race, gender, sexual
    orientation and disability.

    An example of substituting politically correct terminology for terminology
    considered offensive would be exchanging the phrase disabled person for
    cripple when describing a person with a physical or mental disability. Using
    terms such as spaz or nutter to refer to the aforementioned groups would be
    decidedly politically incorrect.

    dmb continues:
    See Your idea of political correctness is very far from the actual meaning
    and it was central to the point you're making about logic. Now its perfectly
    clear why your post made no sense. (One can only wonder what you mean by
    words like 'logic' and 'science'!) I realize its quite a petty and
    small-minded thing, but I do feel refreshed knowing the confusion was Ian's
    fault. ;-)

    Thanks,
    dmb

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Aug 23 2004 - 02:34:10 BST