Re: MD The problem of one self and four discrete levels of static patterns

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Sat Sep 04 2004 - 21:48:13 BST

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD The individual in the MOQ"

    Hi Ilya, Mark:

    Excellent question. IMO believing that self is an illusion is itself an
    illusion. Who can believe the self is an illusion if not a self? Like you,
    I'll be interested in Mark's explanation. I wonder If he'll deny the
    reality of himself. :-)

    Platt

    > Hi Mark,
    >
    > very interesting, really! Still, I don't understand something.
    > How does it happen that in our ordinary life we don't feel
    > ourselves as three separate entities - biological, social and
    > intellectual, but feel ourselves as one whole self?
    > It you say that the self is illusion, then I will ask, THE ILLUSION OF
    > WHOM? I introduced the concept of hierarchy of dominance of patterns to
    > explain this problem and thought the mystery solved. But today I suddenly
    > thought: WHERE or IN WHOM does this hierarchy exist? If there are no place
    > and no one where or in whom the hierarchy exist then the very idea of
    > hierarchy doesn't make any sense! We are exactly where we had started from.
    >
    > Hope you will help to clear things up.
    >
    > Best regards,
    > Ilya

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Sep 04 2004 - 21:43:40 BST